- ■
- ■
Erin Teague, EVP of product management for Disney Entertainment and ESPN: 'Think all the short-form Disney content you'd want in one unified app'—feature parity, not differentiation
- ■
For decision-makers: This signals when streaming platform vertical video transitions from competitive advantage to table stakes—approximately now
- ■
Next threshold: Q3 2026 launch timing. Watch whether Disney's vertical feed drives engagement meaningfully different from competitors' implementations
Disney is adapting, not innovating. The company announced at CES that Disney+ will add a vertical video feed later this year—original short-form programming, repurposed clips, and refashioned scenes from longer content bundled into a dynamic feed. This isn't a market inflection point. It's platform parity. Netflix has been testing this format. ESPN, Disney's own property, launched a "Verts" tab last year. The vertical video consumption pattern isn't new—it's been the dominant user behavior since TikTok and YouTube Shorts won the attention economy. Disney is now officially acknowledging what the market already decided.
The move tells a specific story about platform maturity cycles. Four years ago, vertical video was an edge-case format for streaming platforms, something TikTok and YouTube owned exclusively. Today it's not optional. When ESPN added the "Verts" tab last year—basically a TikTok clone of sports clips inside the ESPN app—it was a tentative experiment. Now Disney+ is doing the same thing across their flagship platform, and Netflix is already ahead of them, testing vertical feeds on their mobile app.
What's actually happening: the streaming platforms finally accepted that they can't fight consumption behavior. The average mobile user now spends more time in vertical video feeds than in traditional horizontal streaming formats. Netflix recognized this first—they've been running vertical video tests for months. Disney was slower, but they're catching up. This is reactive, not visionary. It's also necessary.
Errin Teague, Disney's product lead for this push, framed it simply at CES: "Over time, we'll evolve the experience as we explore applications for a variety of formats, categories, and content types for a dynamic feed of just what you're interested in." That language—"dynamic feed," "refreshed in real time"—is basically admitting they're building the YouTube Shorts/TikTok interface into their own app. The content itself (original short-form, repurposed clips, refashioned scenes) isn't revolutionary. The acceptance that streaming needs to look like social video now is the inflection.
The timing matters differently for different audiences. For enterprise streaming decision-makers, this is confirmation that vertical video isn't optional anymore. If you're running a media platform and you haven't planned for vertical consumption, you're behind. The window for this decision closed about six months ago. For competitors still building their vertical strategy, Disney just moved up your timeline—the market leader is formalizing it, which means enterprise buyers will expect it as standard feature.
But notice what's not happening: Disney isn't claiming this will drive retention. They're not touting engagement metrics that prove vertical video converts viewers better than horizontal content. Netflix and ESPN tested this. Disney is implementing it. The evidence of category adoption is there, but Disney's move isn't creating the demand—it's responding to existing demand that's already thoroughly documented.
The competitive position is worth parsing. Netflix moved first on the vertical feed format specifically for streaming content. Disney is copying that playbook. But Disney has ESPN in their portfolio, and ESPN's "Verts" approach—turning sports clips into TikTok-style content—actually proved more successful in narrow testing than general entertainment verticals did elsewhere. So Disney's hybrid approach makes sense: apply ESPN's winning formula to Disney+ content. Original short-form helps, repurposed clips from existing shows requires no new production.
The mid-year rollout timing tells you this isn't urgent. If Disney believed vertical video was table-stakes-critical, they'd launch in Q1. Instead they're phasing it. That suggests testing, refinement, possibly waiting for Netflix's implementation to stabilize first. It's the play of a company adapting to a market that's already moved, not leading one.
For builders: This matters if you're in content distribution or platform architecture. Vertical-first is no longer a feature request—it's a platform requirement. If your streaming interface isn't vertically native, you're creating friction. For professionals in streaming product and design, watch what Disney actually ships. The gap between "dynamic feed refreshed in real time based on your last visit" and what they actually deploy will tell you how seriously they're taking this versus how much of this is CES theater.
Disney+ is formalizing what the market already decided. Vertical video isn't an innovation anymore—it's infrastructure. For streaming decision-makers, this confirms the timeline: vertical consumption is now default behavior requiring platform support. Investors should note this is table-stakes parity, not competitive moat. Builders need to ensure vertical-native architecture is standard, not an afterthought. Professionals should watch the Q3 execution. The gap between announcement and launch will reveal whether Disney is genuinely rebuilding the platform or shipping a feature that feels bolted-on. Most critical: track engagement data. If vertical video drives meaningful retention lift, platforms that haven't launched yet have months, not quarters, to catch up. If engagement is flat, you're watching a feature parity game rather than a market-moving shift.


